WOODSTOCK vs LUNDS & BYERLYS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
WOODSTOCK: 3
vs
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WOODSTOCK | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 467 cal | 583 cal | |
| Protein | 10 g | 22.2 g | |
| Carbs | 50 g | 19.4 g | |
| Fat | 23.3 g | 50 g | |
| Fiber | 10 g | 11.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WOODSTOCK | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WOODSTOCK | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 133 MG | 250 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.4 MG | 4.5 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 33 MG | 0 MG |