WILD PATAGONIAN RED SHRIMP vs SKINLESS WILD CAUGHT POLLOCK FILLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie, both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
WILD PATAGONIAN RED SHRIMP: 4
vs
SKINLESS WILD CAUGHT POLLOCK FILLETS: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD PATAGONIAN RED SHRIMP | SKINLESS WILD CAUGHT POLLOCK FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 71 cal | 53 cal | |
| Protein | 13.5 g | 9.7 g | |
| Carbs | 0.8 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD PATAGONIAN RED SHRIMP | SKINLESS WILD CAUGHT POLLOCK FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD PATAGONIAN RED SHRIMP | SKINLESS WILD CAUGHT POLLOCK FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 32 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 91 MG | 434 MG |