WILD CAUGHT SUSTAINABLE CHILEAN SEABASS vs WILD ALASKA FLOUNDER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD ALASKA FLOUNDER wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
WILD CAUGHT SUSTAINABLE CHILEAN SEABASS: 1
vs
WILD ALASKA FLOUNDER: 6
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD CAUGHT SUSTAINABLE CHILEAN SEABASS | WILD ALASKA FLOUNDER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 193 cal | 71 cal | |
| Protein | 14.9 g | 15.0 g | |
| Carbs | 0.9 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 14.9 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD CAUGHT SUSTAINABLE CHILEAN SEABASS | WILD ALASKA FLOUNDER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD CAUGHT SUSTAINABLE CHILEAN SEABASS | WILD ALASKA FLOUNDER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 254 MG | 301 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 92 MG | 106 MG |