WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET vs FARM RAISED ATLANTIC SALMON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET: 4
vs
FARM RAISED ATLANTIC SALMON: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | FARM RAISED ATLANTIC SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 86 cal | 212 cal | |
| Protein | 19.2 g | 20.4 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0.7 g | 13.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | FARM RAISED ATLANTIC SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.4 MG | 4.2 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | FARM RAISED ATLANTIC SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 132 MG | 58 MG |