WILD ALASKA POLLOCK vs BONELESS & SKINLESS TILAPIA FILLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD ALASKA POLLOCK wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
WILD ALASKA POLLOCK: 5
vs
BONELESS & SKINLESS TILAPIA FILLETS: 1
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD ALASKA POLLOCK | BONELESS & SKINLESS TILAPIA FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 84 cal | 118 cal | |
| Protein | 17.7 g | 24.7 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 1.2 g | |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 1.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD ALASKA POLLOCK | BONELESS & SKINLESS TILAPIA FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD ALASKA POLLOCK | BONELESS & SKINLESS TILAPIA FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 100 MG | 47 MG |