WILD ALASKA FLOUNDER vs WILD CAUGHT ALBACORE TUNA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD CAUGHT ALBACORE TUNA wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
WILD ALASKA FLOUNDER: 3
vs
WILD CAUGHT ALBACORE TUNA: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD ALASKA FLOUNDER | WILD CAUGHT ALBACORE TUNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 71 cal | 106 cal | |
| Protein | 15.0 g | 22.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 0.9 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD ALASKA FLOUNDER | WILD CAUGHT ALBACORE TUNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD ALASKA FLOUNDER | WILD CAUGHT ALBACORE TUNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 35 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 301 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 106 MG | 35 MG |