WHOLE WHEAT ROLLS vs NATURAL DECADENCE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NATURAL DECADENCE wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
WHOLE WHEAT ROLLS: 3
vs
NATURAL DECADENCE: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHOLE WHEAT ROLLS | NATURAL DECADENCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 281 cal | 211 cal | |
| Protein | 8.8 g | 3.5 g | |
| Carbs | 47.4 g | 42.1 g | |
| Fat | 6.1 g | 3.5 g | |
| Fiber | 7 g | 1.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WHOLE WHEAT ROLLS | NATURAL DECADENCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 21.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHOLE WHEAT ROLLS | NATURAL DECADENCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 35 MG | 35 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.5 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 456 MG | 702 MG |