WHOLE GRAIN WHEAT SUBS ROLLS vs SOURDOUGH ENGLISH MUFFINS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SOURDOUGH ENGLISH MUFFINS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
WHOLE GRAIN WHEAT SUBS ROLLS: 3
vs
SOURDOUGH ENGLISH MUFFINS: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHOLE GRAIN WHEAT SUBS ROLLS | SOURDOUGH ENGLISH MUFFINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 282 cal | 228 cal | |
| Protein | 9.9 g | 8.8 g | |
| Carbs | 56.3 g | 47.4 g | |
| Fat | 3.5 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 7 g | 1.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WHOLE GRAIN WHEAT SUBS ROLLS | SOURDOUGH ENGLISH MUFFINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHOLE GRAIN WHEAT SUBS ROLLS | SOURDOUGH ENGLISH MUFFINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 113 MG | 263 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.8 MG | 3.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 88 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 507 MG | 702 MG |