WHITE SUB ROLLS vs CIABATTA RUSTICA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CIABATTA RUSTICA wins in 7 out of 15 nutrient categories
WHITE SUB ROLLS: 5
vs
CIABATTA RUSTICA: 7
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHITE SUB ROLLS | CIABATTA RUSTICA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 256 cal | 228 cal | |
| Protein | 10 g | 8.8 g | |
| Carbs | 51.1 g | 50.9 g | |
| Fat | 2.2 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 2.2 g | 1.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WHITE SUB ROLLS | CIABATTA RUSTICA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Folate, total | 0 UG | 100 UG | |
| Niacin | 0 MG | 3.3 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0 MG | 0.2 MG | |
| Thiamin | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHITE SUB ROLLS | CIABATTA RUSTICA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 167 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3 MG | 2.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 88 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 567 MG | 526 MG |