WET TAMARIND COOKING PASTE vs SPICY KUNGPAO SAUCE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WET TAMARIND COOKING PASTE wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
WET TAMARIND COOKING PASTE: 3
vs
SPICY KUNGPAO SAUCE: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WET TAMARIND COOKING PASTE | SPICY KUNGPAO SAUCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 288 cal | 93 cal | |
| Protein | 3.1 g | 0.7 g | |
| Carbs | 68.8 g | 23.3 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 6.2 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WET TAMARIND COOKING PASTE | SPICY KUNGPAO SAUCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WET TAMARIND COOKING PASTE | SPICY KUNGPAO SAUCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,000,000 MG | 840 MG |