VIRGINIA BRAND HAM vs SLOW COOKED HAM
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SLOW COOKED HAM wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
VIRGINIA BRAND HAM: 0
vs
SLOW COOKED HAM: 5
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | VIRGINIA BRAND HAM | SLOW COOKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 107 cal | 107 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 16.1 g | 19.6 g | |
| Carbs | 5.4 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 2.7 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | VIRGINIA BRAND HAM | SLOW COOKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 26.8 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | VIRGINIA BRAND HAM | SLOW COOKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0.6 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 893 MG | 1,125 MG |