TRADITIONAL DRIED SAUSAGE vs ANGUS UNCURED BEEF FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TRADITIONAL DRIED SAUSAGE wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
TRADITIONAL DRIED SAUSAGE: 5
vs
ANGUS UNCURED BEEF FRANKS: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TRADITIONAL DRIED SAUSAGE | ANGUS UNCURED BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 429 cal | 286 cal | |
| Protein | 17.9 g | 10.7 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 35.7 g | 26.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TRADITIONAL DRIED SAUSAGE | ANGUS UNCURED BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 4.3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TRADITIONAL DRIED SAUSAGE | ANGUS UNCURED BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 5.1 MG | 1.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 205 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,036 MG | 696 MG |