TORN & GLASSER vs WHOLE NATURAL ALMONDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WHOLE NATURAL ALMONDS wins in 7 out of 12 nutrient categories
TORN & GLASSER: 3
vs
WHOLE NATURAL ALMONDS: 7
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TORN & GLASSER | WHOLE NATURAL ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 486 cal | 556 cal | |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 22.2 g | |
| Carbs | 45.7 g | 16.7 g | |
| Fat | 34.3 g | 50 g | |
| Fiber | 8.6 g | 11.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TORN & GLASSER | WHOLE NATURAL ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TORN & GLASSER | WHOLE NATURAL ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 57 MG | 222 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.1 MG | 4 MG | |
| Magnesium, Mg | 0 MG | 222 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 722 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 157 MG | 0 MG |