SWEET DOUGH vs NATURAL DECADENCE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
SWEET DOUGH: 5
vs
NATURAL DECADENCE: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SWEET DOUGH | NATURAL DECADENCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 240 cal | 211 cal | |
| Protein | 6 g | 3.5 g | |
| Carbs | 48 g | 42.1 g | |
| Fat | 3 g | 3.5 g | |
| Fiber | 2 g | 1.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SWEET DOUGH | NATURAL DECADENCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 21.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SWEET DOUGH | NATURAL DECADENCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 10 MG | 35 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 80 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 440 MG | 702 MG |