SOURDOUGH ENGLISH MUFFIN vs TAKE & BAKE GARLIC CIABATTA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TAKE & BAKE GARLIC CIABATTA wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
SOURDOUGH ENGLISH MUFFIN: 4
vs
TAKE & BAKE GARLIC CIABATTA: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SOURDOUGH ENGLISH MUFFIN | TAKE & BAKE GARLIC CIABATTA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 228 cal | 214 cal | |
| Protein | 7.0 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 45.6 g | 42.9 g | |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 1.8 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SOURDOUGH ENGLISH MUFFIN | TAKE & BAKE GARLIC CIABATTA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.1 MG | |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SOURDOUGH ENGLISH MUFFIN | TAKE & BAKE GARLIC CIABATTA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 175 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.8 MG | 2.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 123 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 544 MG | 446 MG |