SMOKED PORK HOCKS vs VEGETARIAN FISHLESS TUNA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
VEGETARIAN FISHLESS TUNA wins in 10 out of 15 nutrient categories
SMOKED PORK HOCKS: 1
vs
VEGETARIAN FISHLESS TUNA: 10
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SMOKED PORK HOCKS | VEGETARIAN FISHLESS TUNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 232 cal | 116 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 16.3 g | |
| Carbs | 25 g | 11.6 g | |
| Fat | 14.3 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SMOKED PORK HOCKS | VEGETARIAN FISHLESS TUNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 0 MG | 2.8 MG | |
| Thiamin | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin B-12 | 0 UG | 0.6 UG | |
| Vitamin B-6 | 0 MG | 0.1 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SMOKED PORK HOCKS | VEGETARIAN FISHLESS TUNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 93 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 1.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 233 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 554 MG | 349 MG |