SMITHFIELD vs BONELESS FULLY COOKED HAM STEAK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BONELESS FULLY COOKED HAM STEAK wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
SMITHFIELD: 3
vs
BONELESS FULLY COOKED HAM STEAK: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SMITHFIELD | BONELESS FULLY COOKED HAM STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 209 cal | 107 cal | |
| Protein | 18.6 g | 16.1 g | |
| Carbs | 7.0 g | 5.4 g | |
| Fat | 14.0 g | 2.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SMITHFIELD | BONELESS FULLY COOKED HAM STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SMITHFIELD | BONELESS FULLY COOKED HAM STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 233 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.8 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,233 MG | 1,429 MG |