SKINLESS WILD CAUGHT POLLOCK FILLETS vs MEDIUM COOKED SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MEDIUM COOKED SHRIMP wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
SKINLESS WILD CAUGHT POLLOCK FILLETS: 3
vs
MEDIUM COOKED SHRIMP: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SKINLESS WILD CAUGHT POLLOCK FILLETS | MEDIUM COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 53 cal | 62 cal | |
| Protein | 9.7 g | 12.4 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SKINLESS WILD CAUGHT POLLOCK FILLETS | MEDIUM COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SKINLESS WILD CAUGHT POLLOCK FILLETS | MEDIUM COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 24 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 130 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 434 MG | 398 MG |