SKINLESS SWAI FILLETS vs WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SKINLESS SWAI FILLETS wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
SKINLESS SWAI FILLETS: 4
vs
WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SKINLESS SWAI FILLETS | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 62 cal | 86 cal | |
| Protein | 12.4 g | 19.2 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 0.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SKINLESS SWAI FILLETS | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SKINLESS SWAI FILLETS | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.0 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 265 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 186 MG | 132 MG |