SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK SALMON IN WATER vs BLUE HILL BAY
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK SALMON IN WATER: 4
vs
BLUE HILL BAY: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK SALMON IN WATER | BLUE HILL BAY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 190 cal | 191 cal | |
| Protein | 22.2 g | 14.6 g | |
| Carbs | 1.6 g | 12.7 g | |
| Fat | 11.1 g | 9.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK SALMON IN WATER | BLUE HILL BAY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK SALMON IN WATER | BLUE HILL BAY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 95 MG | 73 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 563 MG | 855 MG |