SHRIMP vs ENGLISH STYLE BATTER FISH IN BATTER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SHRIMP wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
SHRIMP: 5
vs
ENGLISH STYLE BATTER FISH IN BATTER: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SHRIMP | ENGLISH STYLE BATTER FISH IN BATTER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 204 cal | 235 cal | |
| Protein | 10.6 g | 9.8 g | |
| Carbs | 15.0 g | 18.6 g | |
| Fat | 11.5 g | 13.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SHRIMP | ENGLISH STYLE BATTER FISH IN BATTER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SHRIMP | ENGLISH STYLE BATTER FISH IN BATTER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.3 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 460 MG | 520 MG |