SEARED TUNA SLICES vs 7/9 OZ CATFISH SHANK FIL
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SEARED TUNA SLICES wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
SEARED TUNA SLICES: 7
vs
7/9 OZ CATFISH SHANK FIL: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SEARED TUNA SLICES | 7/9 OZ CATFISH SHANK FIL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 152 cal | 116 cal | |
| Protein | 25 g | 15.2 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 3.1 g | 6.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SEARED TUNA SLICES | 7/9 OZ CATFISH SHANK FIL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SEARED TUNA SLICES | 7/9 OZ CATFISH SHANK FIL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 89 MG | 8 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.0 MG | 0.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 482 MG | 302 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 402 MG | 98 MG |