SEA BASS WGS 250/350 GR vs CHUM SALMON SIDES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHUM SALMON SIDES wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
SEA BASS WGS 250/350 GR: 3
vs
CHUM SALMON SIDES: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SEA BASS WGS 250/350 GR | CHUM SALMON SIDES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 98 cal | 116 cal | |
| Protein | 18.8 g | 20.5 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SEA BASS WGS 250/350 GR | CHUM SALMON SIDES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SEA BASS WGS 250/350 GR | CHUM SALMON SIDES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 11 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.3 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 256 MG | 429 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 223 MG | 49 MG |