RICOTTA PART SKIM CHEESE vs 11 YEAR AGED WISCONSIN CHEDDAR CHEESE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
11 YEAR AGED WISCONSIN CHEDDAR CHEESE wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
RICOTTA PART SKIM CHEESE: 2
vs
11 YEAR AGED WISCONSIN CHEDDAR CHEESE: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RICOTTA PART SKIM CHEESE | 11 YEAR AGED WISCONSIN CHEDDAR CHEESE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 145 cal | 429 cal | |
| Protein | 9.7 g | 25 g | |
| Carbs | 6.5 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 9.7 g | 35.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RICOTTA PART SKIM CHEESE | 11 YEAR AGED WISCONSIN CHEDDAR CHEESE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RICOTTA PART SKIM CHEESE | 11 YEAR AGED WISCONSIN CHEDDAR CHEESE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 161 MG | 718 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 71 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 137 MG | 607 MG |