POT ROAST SLOW COOKED BEEF CHUCK vs FLATBREADS WITH APPRICOT RICOTTA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FLATBREADS WITH APPRICOT RICOTTA wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
POT ROAST SLOW COOKED BEEF CHUCK: 4
vs
FLATBREADS WITH APPRICOT RICOTTA: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | POT ROAST SLOW COOKED BEEF CHUCK | FLATBREADS WITH APPRICOT RICOTTA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 98 cal | 253 cal | |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 7.4 g | |
| Carbs | 8.7 g | 49.5 g | |
| Fat | 3.9 g | 2.1 g | |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 3.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | POT ROAST SLOW COOKED BEEF CHUCK | FLATBREADS WITH APPRICOT RICOTTA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | POT ROAST SLOW COOKED BEEF CHUCK | FLATBREADS WITH APPRICOT RICOTTA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 20 MG | 84 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.8 MG | 1.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 163 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 166 MG | 21 MG |