POPCORN SHRIMP vs WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
POPCORN SHRIMP: 4
vs
WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | POPCORN SHRIMP | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 274 cal | 86 cal | |
| Protein | 13.3 g | 19.2 g | |
| Carbs | 23.0 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 13.3 g | 0.7 g | |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | POPCORN SHRIMP | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.1 MG | 2.4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | POPCORN SHRIMP | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 35 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.4 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 425 MG | 132 MG |