PIER 33 GOURMET vs MACKEREL STEAK BONELESS FILLET IN TOMATO SAUCE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MACKEREL STEAK BONELESS FILLET IN TOMATO SAUCE wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
PIER 33 GOURMET: 4
vs
MACKEREL STEAK BONELESS FILLET IN TOMATO SAUCE: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PIER 33 GOURMET | MACKEREL STEAK BONELESS FILLET IN TOMATO SAUCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 341 cal | 262 cal | |
| Protein | 36.5 g | 21.8 g | |
| Carbs | 12.9 g | 12.7 g | |
| Fat | 14.1 g | 29.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PIER 33 GOURMET | MACKEREL STEAK BONELESS FILLET IN TOMATO SAUCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 21.2 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | PIER 33 GOURMET | MACKEREL STEAK BONELESS FILLET IN TOMATO SAUCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 47 MG | 455 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 10.6 MG | 2.0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 612 MG | 1,455 MG |