PATAGONIAN WILD CAUGHT SCALLOPS vs SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SHRIMP wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
PATAGONIAN WILD CAUGHT SCALLOPS: 3
vs
SHRIMP: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PATAGONIAN WILD CAUGHT SCALLOPS | SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 73 cal | 106 cal | |
| Protein | 17.3 g | 20.4 g | |
| Carbs | 0.9 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PATAGONIAN WILD CAUGHT SCALLOPS | SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | PATAGONIAN WILD CAUGHT SCALLOPS | SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 16 MG | 53 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.3 MG | 2.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 355 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 336 MG | 487 MG |