PATAGONIAN WILD CAUGHT SCALLOPS vs ALASKA SKINLESS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ALASKA SKINLESS wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
PATAGONIAN WILD CAUGHT SCALLOPS: 3
vs
ALASKA SKINLESS: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PATAGONIAN WILD CAUGHT SCALLOPS | ALASKA SKINLESS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 73 cal | 70 cal | |
| Protein | 17.3 g | 17.6 g | |
| Carbs | 0.9 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PATAGONIAN WILD CAUGHT SCALLOPS | ALASKA SKINLESS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | PATAGONIAN WILD CAUGHT SCALLOPS | ALASKA SKINLESS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 16 MG | 21 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.3 MG | 0.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 355 MG | 331 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 336 MG | 106 MG |