PACIFIC KOMBU vs JALAPENO CHEDDAR HOMESTYLE CASSEROLE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PACIFIC KOMBU wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
PACIFIC KOMBU: 6
vs
JALAPENO CHEDDAR HOMESTYLE CASSEROLE: 4
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PACIFIC KOMBU | JALAPENO CHEDDAR HOMESTYLE CASSEROLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 250 cal | 357 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 50 g | 75 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 7.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PACIFIC KOMBU | JALAPENO CHEDDAR HOMESTYLE CASSEROLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 17.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | PACIFIC KOMBU | JALAPENO CHEDDAR HOMESTYLE CASSEROLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 500 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 6,000 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 2,750 MG | 2,143 MG |