NO SALTED ADDED SKINLESS & BONELESS MACKEREL IN WATER vs CHICKEN OF THE SEA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN OF THE SEA wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
NO SALTED ADDED SKINLESS & BONELESS MACKEREL IN WATER: 4
vs
CHICKEN OF THE SEA: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NO SALTED ADDED SKINLESS & BONELESS MACKEREL IN WATER | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 0 cal | 89 cal | |
| Protein | 23.5 g | 14.3 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 7.1 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | NO SALTED ADDED SKINLESS & BONELESS MACKEREL IN WATER | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | NO SALTED ADDED SKINLESS & BONELESS MACKEREL IN WATER | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 176 MG | 179 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.5 MG | 3.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 124 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 200 MG | 464 MG |