NATURAL SLICED ALMONDS vs LUNDS & BYERLYS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 7 out of 10 nutrient categories
NATURAL SLICED ALMONDS: 2
vs
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 7
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NATURAL SLICED ALMONDS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 567 cal | 534 cal | |
| Protein | 20 g | 24.1 g | |
| Carbs | 20 g | 17.2 g | |
| Fat | 50 g | 44.8 g | |
| Fiber | 13.3 g | 3.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | NATURAL SLICED ALMONDS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | NATURAL SLICED ALMONDS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 267 MG | 34 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 4.8 MG | 14.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 17 MG |