MUKIMAME SHELLED EDAMAME vs TUSCAN INSPIRED SEASONED BLEND
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MUKIMAME SHELLED EDAMAME wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
MUKIMAME SHELLED EDAMAME: 5
vs
TUSCAN INSPIRED SEASONED BLEND: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MUKIMAME SHELLED EDAMAME | TUSCAN INSPIRED SEASONED BLEND | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 141 cal | 94 cal | |
| Protein | 14.1 g | 4.7 g | |
| Carbs | 9.4 g | 14.1 g | |
| Fat | 5.3 g | 8.2 g | |
| Fiber | 7.1 g | 4.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MUKIMAME SHELLED EDAMAME | TUSCAN INSPIRED SEASONED BLEND | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MUKIMAME SHELLED EDAMAME | TUSCAN INSPIRED SEASONED BLEND | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 47 MG | 61 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.2 MG | 1.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 341 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 6 MG | 24 MG |