MEXICAN CASSEROLE TENDER LONG-GRAIN RICE vs 100% ANCIENT GRAIN STEAM IN BAG QUINOA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MEXICAN CASSEROLE TENDER LONG-GRAIN RICE wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
MEXICAN CASSEROLE TENDER LONG-GRAIN RICE: 6
vs
100% ANCIENT GRAIN STEAM IN BAG QUINOA: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MEXICAN CASSEROLE TENDER LONG-GRAIN RICE | 100% ANCIENT GRAIN STEAM IN BAG QUINOA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 114 cal | 121 cal | |
| Protein | 4.3 g | 4.3 g | |
| Carbs | 19.2 g | 22.9 g | |
| Fat | 3.5 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 1.6 g | 2.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MEXICAN CASSEROLE TENDER LONG-GRAIN RICE | 100% ANCIENT GRAIN STEAM IN BAG QUINOA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MEXICAN CASSEROLE TENDER LONG-GRAIN RICE | 100% ANCIENT GRAIN STEAM IN BAG QUINOA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 96 MG | 14 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.8 MG | 3.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 132 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 298 MG | 7 MG |