MACKEREL STEAK BONELESS FILLET IN TOMATO SAUCE vs CROSSPACKED BRISLING SARDINES IN EXTRA VIRGIN OLIVE OIL
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MACKEREL STEAK BONELESS FILLET IN TOMATO SAUCE wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
MACKEREL STEAK BONELESS FILLET IN TOMATO SAUCE: 5
vs
CROSSPACKED BRISLING SARDINES IN EXTRA VIRGIN OLIVE OIL: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MACKEREL STEAK BONELESS FILLET IN TOMATO SAUCE | CROSSPACKED BRISLING SARDINES IN EXTRA VIRGIN OLIVE OIL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 262 cal | 256 cal | |
| Protein | 21.8 g | 19.5 g | |
| Carbs | 12.7 g | 1.2 g | |
| Fat | 29.1 g | 18.3 g | |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 1.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MACKEREL STEAK BONELESS FILLET IN TOMATO SAUCE | CROSSPACKED BRISLING SARDINES IN EXTRA VIRGIN OLIVE OIL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MACKEREL STEAK BONELESS FILLET IN TOMATO SAUCE | CROSSPACKED BRISLING SARDINES IN EXTRA VIRGIN OLIVE OIL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 455 MG | 305 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.0 MG | 1.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,455 MG | 610 MG |