MACKEREL STEAK BONELESS FILLET IN TOMATO SAUCE vs CONSUP N.A.
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CONSUP N.A. wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
MACKEREL STEAK BONELESS FILLET IN TOMATO SAUCE: 3
vs
CONSUP N.A.: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MACKEREL STEAK BONELESS FILLET IN TOMATO SAUCE | CONSUP N.A. | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 262 cal | 200 cal | |
| Protein | 21.8 g | 16.4 g | |
| Carbs | 12.7 g | 5.5 g | |
| Fat | 29.1 g | 10.9 g | |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 1.8 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MACKEREL STEAK BONELESS FILLET IN TOMATO SAUCE | CONSUP N.A. | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MACKEREL STEAK BONELESS FILLET IN TOMATO SAUCE | CONSUP N.A. | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 455 MG | 145 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.0 MG | 4.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,455 MG | 745 MG |