MACKEREL IN BRINE vs SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK SALMON IN WATER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MACKEREL IN BRINE wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
MACKEREL IN BRINE: 6
vs
SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK SALMON IN WATER: 1
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MACKEREL IN BRINE | SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK SALMON IN WATER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 145 cal | 190 cal | |
| Protein | 23.6 g | 22.2 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 1.6 g | |
| Fat | 5.5 g | 11.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MACKEREL IN BRINE | SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK SALMON IN WATER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MACKEREL IN BRINE | SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK SALMON IN WATER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 273 MG | 95 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 364 MG | 563 MG |