MACKEREL IN BRINE vs ORIGINAL SCUNGILLI SLICED CONCH
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie, both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
MACKEREL IN BRINE: 4
vs
ORIGINAL SCUNGILLI SLICED CONCH: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MACKEREL IN BRINE | ORIGINAL SCUNGILLI SLICED CONCH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 145 cal | 59 cal | |
| Protein | 23.6 g | 10.6 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 3.5 g | |
| Fat | 5.5 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MACKEREL IN BRINE | ORIGINAL SCUNGILLI SLICED CONCH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MACKEREL IN BRINE | ORIGINAL SCUNGILLI SLICED CONCH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 273 MG | 35 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.6 MG | 2.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 153 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 364 MG | 553 MG |