LUNDS & BYERLYS vs ALMONDS WHOLE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 7 out of 10 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 7
vs
ALMONDS WHOLE: 2
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | ALMONDS WHOLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 465 cal | 571 cal | |
| Protein | 34.9 g | 21.4 g | |
| Carbs | 32.6 g | 21.4 g | |
| Fat | 25.6 g | 50 g | |
| Fiber | 18.6 g | 10.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | ALMONDS WHOLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.8 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | ALMONDS WHOLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 140 MG | 214 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.8 MG | 2.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 163 MG | 0 MG |