LUNDS & BYERLYS vs DRY ROASTED SLICED ALMONDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 6
vs
DRY ROASTED SLICED ALMONDS: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | DRY ROASTED SLICED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 465 cal | 600 cal | |
| Protein | 34.9 g | 22.9 g | |
| Carbs | 32.6 g | 20 g | |
| Fat | 25.6 g | 51.4 g | |
| Fiber | 18.6 g | 11.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | DRY ROASTED SLICED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.8 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | DRY ROASTED SLICED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 140 MG | 257 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.8 MG | 3.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |