LUNDS & BYERLYS vs WHOLE NATURAL ALMONDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 7 out of 12 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 7
vs
WHOLE NATURAL ALMONDS: 4
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | WHOLE NATURAL ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 526 cal | 581 cal | |
| Protein | 33.3 g | 20.9 g | |
| Carbs | 14.0 g | 20.9 g | |
| Fat | 42.1 g | 48.8 g | |
| Fiber | 3.5 g | 11.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | WHOLE NATURAL ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.1 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | WHOLE NATURAL ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 35 MG | 256 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 14.8 MG | 3.7 MG | |
| Magnesium, Mg | 0 MG | 267 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 698 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 579 MG | 0 MG |