LUNDS & BYERLYS vs ROASTED SALTED ALMONDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 7 out of 13 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 7
vs
ROASTED SALTED ALMONDS: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | ROASTED SALTED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 526 cal | 607 cal | |
| Protein | 33.3 g | 21.4 g | |
| Carbs | 14.0 g | 17.9 g | |
| Fat | 42.1 g | 57.1 g | |
| Fiber | 3.5 g | 10.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | ROASTED SALTED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.1 MG | 0 MG | |
| Vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol) | 0 MG | 26 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | ROASTED SALTED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 35 MG | 286 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 14.8 MG | 3.6 MG | |
| Magnesium, Mg | 0 MG | 268 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 679 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 579 MG | 304 MG |