LUNDS & BYERLYS vs SLICED ALMONDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 6
vs
SLICED ALMONDS: 4
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | SLICED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 534 cal | 600 cal | |
| Protein | 24.1 g | 20 g | |
| Carbs | 17.2 g | 26.7 g | |
| Fat | 44.8 g | 46.7 g | |
| Fiber | 3.4 g | 10 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | SLICED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.1 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | SLICED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 34 MG | 267 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 14.9 MG | 3.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 667 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 17 MG | 150 MG |