LUNDS & BYERLYS vs TORN & GLASSER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 4
vs
TORN & GLASSER: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | TORN & GLASSER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 571 cal | 579 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 31.6 g | |
| Carbs | 50 g | 15.8 g | |
| Fat | 39.3 g | 47.4 g | |
| Fiber | 7.1 g | 5.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | TORN & GLASSER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | TORN & GLASSER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.6 MG | 7.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 857 MG | 263 MG |