LUNDS & BYERLYS vs TORN & GLASSER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TORN & GLASSER wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 2
vs
TORN & GLASSER: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | TORN & GLASSER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 571 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 17.5 g | |
| Carbs | 50 g | 40 g | |
| Fat | 39.3 g | 35 g | |
| Fiber | 7.1 g | 7.5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | TORN & GLASSER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | TORN & GLASSER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 100 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.6 MG | 1.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 857 MG | 200 MG |