LEE KUM KEE vs PICAFLOR
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LEE KUM KEE wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
LEE KUM KEE: 3
vs
PICAFLOR: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LEE KUM KEE | PICAFLOR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 143 cal | 240 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 2 g | |
| Carbs | 28.6 g | 4 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LEE KUM KEE | PICAFLOR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 85.7 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | LEE KUM KEE | PICAFLOR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 2,714 MG | 1,820 MG |