KUM & GO vs GOLDEN FLAKE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
GOLDEN FLAKE wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
KUM & GO: 2
vs
GOLDEN FLAKE: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | KUM & GO | GOLDEN FLAKE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 476 cal | 317 cal | |
| Protein | 2.4 g | 12.4 g | |
| Carbs | 64.3 g | 12.4 g | |
| Fat | 23.8 g | 24.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 5.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | KUM & GO | GOLDEN FLAKE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | KUM & GO | GOLDEN FLAKE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 95 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 36 MG | 185 MG |