KIRKWOOD vs BONELESS SKINLESS CHICKEN TENDERLOINS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
KIRKWOOD wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
KIRKWOOD: 4
vs
BONELESS SKINLESS CHICKEN TENDERLOINS: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | KIRKWOOD | BONELESS SKINLESS CHICKEN TENDERLOINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 98 cal | 86 cal | |
| Protein | 20.5 g | 20 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0.7 g | |
| Fat | 2.2 g | 0.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | KIRKWOOD | BONELESS SKINLESS CHICKEN TENDERLOINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | KIRKWOOD | BONELESS SKINLESS CHICKEN TENDERLOINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 14 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0.5 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 196 MG | 79 MG |