HIGH LINER vs WAKEFIELD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WAKEFIELD wins in 7 out of 10 nutrient categories
HIGH LINER: 2
vs
WAKEFIELD: 7
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HIGH LINER | WAKEFIELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 182 cal | 89 cal | |
| Protein | 14.9 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 14.9 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 6.5 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0.6 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HIGH LINER | WAKEFIELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 3.1 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | HIGH LINER | WAKEFIELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 13 MG | 107 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.5 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 286 MG | 357 MG |