FULLY COOKED BONELESS HAM STEAK vs TARAMA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TARAMA wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
FULLY COOKED BONELESS HAM STEAK: 1
vs
TARAMA: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FULLY COOKED BONELESS HAM STEAK | TARAMA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 131 cal | 133 cal | |
| Protein | 19.1 g | 20 g | |
| Carbs | 1.2 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 4.8 g | 3.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FULLY COOKED BONELESS HAM STEAK | TARAMA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FULLY COOKED BONELESS HAM STEAK | TARAMA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 2.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 583 MG | 4,667 MG |